Home > Uncategorized > Roberta Millstein – Thinking about Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic: Conceptual and Ethical Issues

Roberta Millstein – Thinking about Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic: Conceptual and Ethical Issues

English follows

Le Groupe de recherche en éthique environnementale et animale (GRÉEA) a le plaisir de vous inviter à son prochain événement en ligne :

Roberta Millstein, UC Davis, “Thinking about Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic: Conceptual and Ethical Issues“(voir résumé ci-dessous). La conférence aura lieu sur ZOOM mardi 19 janvier 2021 à 14h (EST).

La préinscription par courriel est requise : ely.mermans@umontreal.ca

Pour toute question sur l’accessibilité de l’événement, n’hésitez pas à nous contacter.

Le GRÉEA est surPeerTube, YouTube, Soundcloud

The Research Group in Environmental and Animal Ethics (GRÉEA) is pleased to invite you to its next online event:

Roberta Millstein, UC Davis, “Thinking about Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic: Conceptual and Ethical Issues“(see abstract below).This event will be held via ZOOM on January 19, 2021 at 2:00 pm (EST).

Registration by e-mail is required:ely.mermans@umontreal.ca

For any accessibility issues, please feel free to contact us.
GRÉEA’s PeerTube, YouTube, Soundcloud channels

Abstract

This talk will provide an overview of my work-in-progress, a new interpretation and new defense of Aldo Leopold’s land ethic. Leopold was a 20th century forester, wildlife manager, ecologist, conservationist, and professor, best known for his posthumously published book A Sand County Almanac (ASCA). In ASCA, Leopold outlines the land ethic, a view that has been widely discussed by environmental ethicists as well as historians and conservation biologists (and people in related fields). However, the existing literature on the land ethic overlooks a number of important issues. The first is historical: the nature of the influence of Charles Darwin on Leopold. Indeed, a history and philosophy of biology approach toward Leopold is missing more generally – there are a number of conceptual issues that can only be understood by looking beyond ASCA to Leopold’s other writings in the context of his life experiences. These issues include addressing what Leopold meant by land community, by interdependence, and by stability and land health, all of which are essential for understanding his land ethic; they also include determining how these concepts fare in light of contemporary ecology. The clarification of these conceptual issues puts us in a position to understand the upshot of Leopold’s argument for the land ethic, a simple argument from consistency that explains why we should expand our moral community to include the land (soils, waters, plants, and animals, understood collectively). In short, we need incorporate history and philosophy of ecology and contemporary ecology in order to understand and appreciate the land ethic and Leopold’s argument for it.

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: