Home > Uncategorized > Christopher H. Lean – Against Ecological Neoliberalism

Christopher H. Lean – Against Ecological Neoliberalism

November 25, 2020 Leave a comment Go to comments

Le français suit

The Research Group in Environmental and Animal Ethics (GRÉEA) is pleased to invite you to its next online event:

Christopher H. Lean, University of Sydney, « Against Ecological Neoliberalism »(see abstract below).This event will be held through ZOOM on December 8, 2020 at 6:00 pm (EST).

Registration by e-mail is required:ely.mermans@umontreal.ca

For any accessibility issues, please feel free to contact us (ASL interpretation to be confirmed).

Le Groupe de recherche en éthique environnementale et animale (GRÉEA) a le plaisir de vous inviter à son prochain événement en ligne :

Christopher H. Lean, University of Sydney, « Against Ecological Neoliberalism »(voir résumé ci-dessous). La conférence aura lieu sur ZOOM mardi 8 décembre 2020 à 18h (EST).

La préinscription par courriel est requise : ely.mermans@umontreal.ca

Pour toute question sur l’accessibilité de l’événement, n’hésitez pas à nous contacter (interprétation ASL à confirmer).


Philosophers previously have explored the connection between population ecology and economics through the population models they share. There has been, however, a more recent exchange between political and normative strands of economics and conservation ecology, one that focuses not just on population models but the justifications for intervening in nature’s economy. This is the emergence of what I am referring to as ecological neoliberalism through a union of political convenience between those sceptical of invasive species control and the supporters of globalised free-market ideology (including authors from The Economist). Ecological neoliberalism is the position that there should be open biotic borders, and we should not control the free movement of species. When species can move and interact with new ecological systems, they create novel ecosystems. These novel arrangements create experimental markets in nature’s economy, providing opportunities for the efficient production of goods for humans (ecosystem services). When invasives supersede local populations, it indicates previous biotic systems were inefficient, which is why they were replaced, and therefore it is wrong to protect indigenous ‘losers’ from extinction. Those who act to defend indigenous species are accused of being xenophobic against recent biotic migrants. This paper outlines the disconnect between the economic and political arguments as applied to human economies and nature’s economy.


  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: